THE HIERARCHICAL NATURE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Autores/as

  • ALEJANDRO SEGURA DE LA CAL Department of Architectural Constructions and Their Control, Technical University of Madrid—Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • ANTONIO MARTÍNEZ RAYA Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • GUSTAVO MORALES-ALONSO Department of Organizational Engineering, Business Administration and Statistics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Madrid, Spain.
  • DANIEL JOSÉ GALLEGO MORALES Doctor en Economía y profesor investigador en el Departamento de Economía Aplicada I. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v23i2.1965

Resumen

Despite its real-world importance, entrepreneurship is surpris- ingly absent from neoclassical economic models (Huerta de Soto, 2008, p.6). Thus, while the real world is in a constant state of dise- quilibrium, neoclassical models strive to represent equilibrium states in which entrepreneurship is merely mentioned as a factor of production that coordinates the other factors, and is expressed through the concepts of organization, innovation, and efficiency. This tradition inherits from classical literature, with the prominent role of Richard Cantillon in the first half of the 18th century as a pioneer in the use of the French concept of entreprendre in the eco- nomic context, as noted by Rothbard (1995).

Descargas

Total de descargas desde la publicación: 0

Referencias

Abel, A.B., & Bernanke, B.S. (2001). Macroeconomía. Pearson.

Bajo, O., & Monés, J. (2000). Curso de macroeconomía. Antoni Bosch Editor.

Baumol, W.J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-921. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712

Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. (1959 [1899]). Capital and interest. Volume I. Libertarian Press.

Cantillon, R. (2015 [1755]). Essay on the nature of trade in general (A.E. Murphy, Trans. & Ed.). Liberty Fund.

Fisher, I. (1907). The rate of interest: Its nature, determination, and relation to economic phenomena. The Macmillan Company.

Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C.A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M.A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Hayek, F.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1809376

Hayek, F.A. (1935 [1995]). Edwin Cannan. In B. Caldwell (Ed.), The collected works of F.A. Hayek, Volume 9: Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays, Correspondence (pp. 64-73). Liberty Fund.

Huerta de Soto, J. (1992). Socialismo, cálculo económico y función empresarial. Unión Editorial.

Huerta de Soto, J. (2002). Nuevos estudios de economía política. Unión Editorial.

Huerta de Soto, J. (2008). The Austrian School: Market Order and Entrepreneurial Creativity. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Iversen, J., Jørgensen, R., & Malchow-Møller, N. (2008). Defining and measuring entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000020

Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press.

Long, W. (1983). The meaning of entrepreneurship. American Journal of Small Business, 8(2), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878300800209

Marshall, A. (1890 [1920]). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Macmillan and Co.

Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press.

Menger, C. (1871 [2007]). Principles of economics. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Mises, L.v. (1949 [2021]). La acción humana: Tratado de economía (14.ª ed.). Unión Editorial.

Mises, L.v. (1966). Human action: A treatise on economics (3rd rev. ed.). Henry Regnery Company.

Morales Alonso, G., & Nuñez Guerrero, Y. (2022). Entorno económico y organizacional para ingenieros. Sanz y Torres.

Moreno-Casas, V., & Bagus, P. (2022). Dynamic efficiency and economic complexity. Economic Affairs, 42(1), 92-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12509

Moreno-Casas, V. (2023). The Harvard-MIT complexity approach to development and Austrian economics: Similarities and policy implications. Review of Austrian Economics, 36, 515-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-021-00565-6

Robbins, L. (1934). Essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan and Company.

Rothbard, M.N. (1995). An Austrian perspective on the history of economic thought. Volume I: Economic thought before Adam Smith. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Say, J.-B. (1803 [1821]). A treatise on political economy; or, The production, distribution, and consumption of wealth (C.R. Prinsep, Trans.). Wells and Lilly.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper & Brothers Publishers.

Segura de la Cal, A. (2024). Análisis del Proceso de Capitalización del Sector Inmobiliario Español. The entrepreneurial function as an integrating element of the productive process: an Austrian perspective of the factors of production (in short). Architectural Constructions and Their Control, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. https://oa.upm.es/81421/

Smith, A. (2007 [1776]). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Books I, II, III, IV, and V. ΜεταLibri.

Descargas

Número

Sección

Notas

Cómo citar

THE HIERARCHICAL NATURE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 377–391, . DOI: 10.52195/pm.v23i2.1965. Disponível em: https://procesosdemercado.com/revista/2025/vol-23/num-2/the-hierarchical-nature-of-entrepreneurship. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2026.