La Legitimidad como Capital Moral Dinámico: Insolvencia Política y el Colapso del Estado Moderno

Authors

  • CRISTÓBAL LARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v24i1.2007

Keywords

Legitimacy, Praxeology, Political Usufruct, Narrative Debt, Polycentric Order.

Abstract

This article proposes a praxeological reinterpretation of political legitimacy, overcoming the static conceptions of legal positivism and classical contractualism. Based on the axiom of human action and the inalienability of the ontological will, legitimacy is reconceptualized as a “dynamic moral capital”: an intangible asset yielded by the individual—the bare owner—to the State in a temporary and conditional manner, operating under the legal figure of usufruct. The analysis demonstrates that political power operates through the issuance of a “narrative debt,” whose coercive and centralized materialization is technically insolvent given the theoretical impossibility of economic calculation in the public sector. This chronic insolvency leads to inescapable cycles of institutional entropy, where the collapse of the prevailing order is precipitated by the convergence of objective windows of crisis with the action of political entrepreneurs, who act as coordinating agents offering alternatives perceived as solvent. Finally, facing the hermeneutic monopoly of the State and the legislative usurpation of authentic law, a meta-legal framework based on polycentric governance is proposed. This order of free political usufruct, anchored in private property, contractual responsibility, and the right of exit or secession, aligns institutional incentives with spontaneous social coordination.

Downloads

Total downloads since publication: 1

References

Benson, B. L. (1990) 2000. Justicia sin Estado: la empresa del derecho. Unión Editorial.

Godofredo, D., ed. 1583. Corpus iuris civilis.

Hayek, F. A. (1973) 2006. Derecho, legislación y libertad: una nueva formulación de los principios liberales de la justicia y de la economía política. Unión Editorial.

Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviatán: o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Hoppe, H. H. 2001. Democracy: The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order. Transaction Publishers.

Huerta de Soto, J. (1992) 2020. Socialismo, cálculo económico y función empresarial. Unión Editorial.

Huerta de Soto, J. (1998) 2009. Dinero, crédito bancario y ciclos económicos. Unión Editorial.

Jouvenel, B. (1945) 2008. Sobre el Poder: historia natural de su crecimiento. Unión Editorial.

Kelsen, H. (1934) 1982. Teoría pura del derecho. Eudeba.

Leoni, B. (1961) 2010. La libertad y la ley. Unión Editorial.

Mises, L. v. (1944) 2005. Burocracia. Unión Editorial.

Mises, L. v. (1949) 2011. La acción humana: tratado de economía. Unión Editorial.

Molinari, G. (1849) 2019. La producción de seguridad. Instituto Mises.

Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.

Ostrom, E. 2010. "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems". American Economic Review, 641-72.

Rothbard, M. N. (1982) 1995. La ética de la libertad. Unión Editorial.

Weber, M. (1922) 2014. Economía y sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

La Legitimidad como Capital Moral Dinámico: Insolvencia Política y el Colapso del Estado Moderno. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 267–285, . DOI: 10.52195/pm.v24i1.2007. Available at: https://procesosdemercado.com/en/journal/2026/vol-24/num-1/la-legitimidad-como-capital-moral-dinamico-insolvencia-politica-y-el-colapso-del-estado-moderno. Accessed: 22 sep.. 2026.